Dear Friends, Herewith we are sending latest updates on Tsunami rebuilding activities inSri Lanka. Please let us know your comments and suggestions for futureaction. Circulate this widely RegardsSarath FernandoCo-Secretary MONLAR Tsunami Update II - January 22, 2005 Call for Vigilance to people of all countiesSent by MONLAR and ANRHR This follows our information Bulleting ( I), sent about a week ago. In our previous letter we spoke about the "Issues and New Developments inRelation to process of the Tsunami in Sri Lanka" The alarming newdevelopments that we saw are now being further confirmed, 1. The Chairman of the Task Force for Rebuilding the Nation stated that theRebuilding Process after Tsunami would also include the Plans that hadalready been there before Tsunami. He was obviously referring to the"Regaining Sri Lanka" Strategy and Plans that had been agreed upon at thePrevious "Donors Meeting held in Tokyo in June 2003". It should be notedthat this Strategy of Economic Reforms that was agreed upon were stronglyopposed by the people in Sri Lanka. This strategy proposed by the UNFGovernment was rejected by the People at the General Elections in April2004. Chandrika and the UPFA (United People's Freedom Alliance) criticizedthis economic policy and promised to do differently. The "Budget 2005"proposed in November 2004 was strongly critical of these strategies andreforms. Although the WB.IMF, ADB and the "Donor" Governments such as Japan,USA, and EU were very keen to continue the same it was politically difficultfor the UPFA to push this agenda. 2. Tsunami provided an easy opportunity for both the major parties as wellas the big powers of USA, Japan and others to go back to their previousplans. 3. The plans of the New Task Force were finalized on 15th of January andwere announced on the 17th. In a full page advertisement by the Task Forcefor Rebuilding the Nation in all news paper it stated the Objective asfollows, The objective is to put in place a new infrastructure and systems to meetthe challenges of the 21st century and fulfill the dreams and aspirations ofa modern society. The introduction or preamble to the objective and action plan of TAFREN isclearly stated as follows. "The best tribute we can pay to those who havelost their lives is to restore life in the affected areas. The economic,social and development activity must continue in order to build a prosperousfuture for the people who have been affected by this disaster and the nationas a whole. We need to examine and analyze whether the action plan and the objective inthe operational section will enable the nation to pay the best tribute tothose who have lost their lives. Will a new infrastructure and systems to meet the challenges of the 21stcentury designed to fulfill the dreams and ambitions of a Modern Societyenable the people who have been affected by this disaster and the nation asa whole to build a prosperous future? The nation includes the 80 percent ofthe population in rural areas a vast majority of whom are subsistencefarmers, agricultural workers and casual employees. What is modern society?Is it the Western Province? Whatever modern society is, those who have beenaffected by the disaster and the vast majority of people in the rural areasdo not belong to the modern society. Putting in place a new infrastructureand systems to fulfil the dreams and aspirations of a modern society willtherefore the irrelevant and harmful to them. Almost immediately the Government announced that the Construction of theColombo Matara Super Highway would be included in the rebuilding programme.Within days of these announcements armed police went in to the areas wherepeople were resisting their eviction from land to make way for the highwayand threatened them to leave. Those in charge of land acquisition told theresisting communities that their houses would be soon bulldozed. A letterthat was received by some people who faced these threats is sent separately(attached) Water privatisation policies rushed through. On 30th December, just 4 days after Tsunami, the Government introduced apolicy document on National Water Resourcesand obtained Cabinet approval.This bill initially drafted in 2000 aimed at inviting the private sector forwater development and water marketing, in the name of making arrangementsfor better water management. People resisted this policy and the initialdraft was withdrawn and amended by both governments. The new Governmentpromised that they would not do any water privatisation or marketing ofwater. However, the ADB continued its insistence that these water policyreforms for privatisation should be adopted and implemented if theGovernment was to receive the loans. The introduction of Water Privatisationpolicies on the aftermath of Tsunami was a clear indication that thecontinuation of the anti poor policies of economic reforms would beintegrated with the Post Tsunami reconstruction. The "Rebuilding the Affected Area" plans produced by Dept of NationalPlanning, Ministry id Finance and Planning - January 2005 has included awhole series of "Re-establishment of pipe borne water supply scheme" in 10Districts Hambantota, Colombo, Gampaha, Puttalam, Ampara, Matara, Galle,Tricomalee, Batticaloa, Kalutara, Jaffna and Mullativu. If these proposals are really aimed at rebuilding the damaged water supplysystems for the affected people this is appreciable. However, if this is acase of utilizing the situation and the rebuilding process for building thetype of water infrastructure that were planned earlier in order to buildinfrastructure for big private water companies to begin marketing of waterit is a total abuse of the Tsunami relief assistance. The rushing of theWater Resources Policy, to meet the deadlines laid by the ADB, creates asuspicion that the poor people in the urban areas will soon be compelled topay heavily for their drinking water to private and local water businesses.The declaration by the task force that previous plans would be integrated into the Tsunami rebuilding plans confirms these fears. Proposal to Sell away of the Eppawela Phosphate Deposits Revived At a public gathering at Narahenpita on 16th January as reported inLankadeepa - a major Sinhala Daily in Sri Lanka, the President made thisstatement. She said that it was a big mistake not to utilize the richnatural resources in the country and Tsunami was a way by which Naturepunished the country for not utilizing these natural resources. She said, "It has been founded that we have rich natural Gas in our seas, There arevery valuable gems not yet unearthed We are only scratching the surface. Ifwe go deeper as is done in African countries we can find enough wealth tolast all our life." "There is a great mountain of Phosphate in the North Central Province. ABuddhist monk and a few others were shouting against the utilisation ofthese deposits. It was stopped. I am also answerable for this mistake. Weget frightened when they shout. We will not do this in the future" "If this small group of protesters shout on the streets again we will notput them in Jail. We will lock them up in a hotel and we will give them goodfood, and then we will continue our work" She was referring to the huge protest movements in the country that includedpeople of all sectors, scientists, scholars and clergy that protestedagainst the selling away of National Resources and violation of HumanRights. led by the ANRHR. This was not a hundred or two hundred people butover two hundred people's organisations covering all sectors of society. The Post Tsunami rebuilding plans include the building of 8 new fishingharbours and rehabilitation of 13 Fishery harbours that were damaged in 8Disrticts There were previous proposals to build big, modern fisheryharbours to be built by big companies to anchor big fishing vessels. Thiswas to attract big fishing companies for deep sea harvesting There wereearlier threats of thus displacing the small scale fish workers. Themovements of fish workers such as the National Fisheries Solidarity werecampaigning to protect the fishing rights of small scale fisher communities.These proposals combined with the rushed decision not to allow the fishercommunities to resettle in the coastal belt increases the fears andsuspicions Tourist Hotels promoted in the coastal belt. From the beginning the Government and the "new rebuilders of the nation"have repeatedly stated that the continuation of tourism and tourist hotelsin the "protective" border of 300 meters would be encouraged. Presidentstated that the repairs and reopening of the Hotels within the border wouldnot be prevented. Budget for Tourism for 2005 has been doubled. On 18thJanuary 2005, as stated in - Daily News ( Sri Lanka ) on January 21, 2005,the Minister of Tourism, Anura Bandaranayake said, "Sri Lanka has many properties away from the coast. Tourists still prefer tovisit the hotels on the coastal belt and this is one reason we want to haveflexibility on this 100 meters proposal" So, it is clear that the whole plan is one of driving away about 800,000small scale fish workers and their families from their livelihoods andsettlements near the beaches in order to clear the beaches and the searesources of the people living on the sea, to make way for rich touristbusinesses and big fishing industry. Elections to be postponed for 5 years and the Big political Parties to unite The Big Private Businesses represented by the Joint Business Forum ( JBIS )has been saying repeatedly that the two big rightwing political partiesshould join if the economic reforms of Neo Liberalism is to succeed in SriLanka. Tsunmai provide the opportunity to the WB, IMF and other powers tointervene in bringing about this united. Mr. James Wolfensohn the Presidentof the WB visited Sri Lanka immediately after Tsunami and met only thePresident, Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition and left . Wefeel this visit was to finalize the above agreement. UNF that proposed the"Regaining Sri Lanka" is now extremely happy that their plans that weredefeated by the people have now been totally accepted by the UPFA thatpromised to do otherwise. A few big NGOs that have had a practise of working in close collaborationwith the WB, IMF and other powers, that have been campaigning for the "unityof the big parties" as necessary for the continuation of the peace process ,without raising issues of economic policies and economic justice to thepoor, have now begun to play a prominent role in this united approach of thetwo big parties. Similar measures have been adopted to get some of theJournalists not to raise these essential questions for protection of theinterests of the victims of tsunami and of other natural and socio politicaldisasters. The situation in other affected countries such as India, Indonesia and so onare not very different in any way. In this situation of danger, it is urgentand absolutely necessary for the local people, their movements for justiceshould unite with the global efforts towards Working for Justice for theTsunami survivors in South Asia and else where. Close monitoring of thesedevelopments and building pro people solidarity is one of the top mostpriorities is a disaster worse than Tsunami is to be prevented. We appeal to all people of good will of all countries to insist on justiceto Tsunami victims by demanding the Governments of the respective countriesbe vigilant about the abuse of the funds contributed by their people. Update III - will include the proposals of People's Organizationsrepresented by MONLAR and ANRHR Written by:Sarath Fernandoon behalf ofMovement for National Land and Agricultural Reform and Alliance forProtection of national Resourcesand Human Rights